Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 8, 2018International Journal of OphthalmologyOpen Access

Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RSRamin SaloutiShiraz University of Medical SciencesAAAliagha AlishiriBaqiyatallah University of Medical SciencesRGReza Gharebaghi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Salouti et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a91237f7f3c4900d871148chttps://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.08.13
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer2005 · 1,329 citations
  2. 2The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma2016 · 42 citations
  3. 3The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature2015 · 82 citations