Why the study?
Does Abciximab differ from Lamifiban in inhibiting and reversing platelet aggregation under different shear and anticoagulant conditions?
Does Abciximab differ from Lamifiban in inhibiting and reversing platelet aggregation under different shear and anticoagulant conditions?
The inhibitory capacity of Abciximab on platelet aggregation is highly dependent on shear conditions and the type of anticoagulant used, unlike Lamifiban.
Condition-specific GPIIb/IIIa antagonist effects under shear and anticoagulation warrant validation; leaves open clinical translation in arterial thrombosis.
Shear influences platelet aggregate formation and stability, as well as the inhibitory capacities of antithrombotic drugs. We compared the inhibitory and disaggregating properties of two distinct alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists, Abciximab and Lamifiban, on platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (5 micromol/l) in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), in an aggregometer (poorly defined low shear, <100/s) and in a microcouette at arterial shear rate (1,000/s). Platelet aggregation was detected by changes in light transmission in the aggregometer (TA), and by particle counting with a flow cytometer (PA). Lamifiban (1 mumol/l) completely inhibited TA or PA induced by ADP in citrated PRP in the aggregometer or microcouette. In contrast, Abciximab (2 micromol/l) only partially inhibited PA in the microcouette while blocking both TA and PA in the aggregometer. Moreover, Abciximab did not reverse platelet aggregates formed either in the microcouette or in the aggregometer, whereas Lamifiban caused complete reversal. On the contrary, Abciximab completely inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP in hirudin/d-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethylketone PRP in the microcouette. Our results demonstrate a marked dependence of inhibitory capacity of Abciximab on shear conditions, with citrate anticoagulant responsible for the residual aggregation, in contrast to Lamifiban, another alphaIIbbeta3 antagonist interacting with a distinct site on beta3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frojmovic et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: