Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The binding energy of ClF3, with respect to ClF and F2, has been calculated using large multi-reference CI expansions and a variety of basis sets. The largest basis set included two sets of d functions on all centres and one set of f functions on chlorine. The contracted CI method was used. The best result obtained was +63 kJ mol-1 compared to the experimental value of +113 kJ mol-1. The SCF value is +21 kJ mol-1 and the CASSCF value -116·4 kJ mol-1. For the atomization energy a slightly different picture is seen, with the SCF value -96 kJ mol-1, the CASSCF value +84 kJ mol-1, the CI value +364 kJ mol-1 and the experimental value +532 kJ mol-1. Unlinked cluster contributions were found to be important. The bond distance in ClF was further optimized, which was also found to be a difficult problem. With f functions on both centres the multi-reference CI calculations resulted in an error of 0·03 Å, when CASSCF orbitals were used, and of 0·02 Å when SCF orbitals were used. The remaining errors for ClF3 and ClF are analysed. The interesting electronic structure of ClF3 is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pettersson et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: