Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Feb 1941Epithelioma of the Penis Frank D. NaegeliM.D. Frank D. NaegeliFrank D. Naegeli View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)71041-5AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1941 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byHanash K, Furlow W, Utz D and Harrison E (2018) Carcinoma of the Penis: A Clinicopathologic StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 104, NO. 2, (291-297), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1970.McDonald J and Deniz E (2018) A Technique for Revision of the Urethra in Partial Amputation of the PenisJournal of Urology, VOL. 84, NO. 1, (113-114), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1960.Colon J (2018) Carcinoma of the PenisJournal of Urology, VOL. 67, NO. 5, (702-708), Online publication date: 1-May-1952.Melicow M and Ganem E (2018) Cancerous and Precancerous Lesions of the Penis: A Clinical and Pathological Study Based on Twenty-three CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 55, NO. 5, (486-514), Online publication date: 1-May-1946. Volume 45Issue 2February 1941Page: 202-215 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1941 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Frank D. Naegeli More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank D. Naegeli (1941) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: