Article1 December 1959FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE MECHANISM OF ULCER PAINE. CLINTON TEXTER JR., M.D., F.A.C.P., GASTON R. VANTRAPPEN, M.D., HAROLD P. LAZAR, M.D., ERNESTO J. PULETTI, M.D., CLIFFORD J. BARBORKA, M.D., F.A.C.P.E. CLINTON TEXTER JR., M.D., F.A.C.P.Search for more papers by this author, GASTON R. VANTRAPPEN, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, HAROLD P. LAZAR, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, ERNESTO J. PULETTI, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, CLIFFORD J. BARBORKA, M.D., F.A.C.P.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-51-6-1275 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptDirect chemical irritation by hydrochloric acid and disordered motor activity of the stomach and duodenum have been implicated in the causation of ulcer pain. The presence or absence of vascular engorgement of the mucosa in the region of the ulcer has also been related to ulcer pain. Many investigators have tended to support one or the other points of view without implicating other factors. Although the concept of direct chemical irritation has been the more commonly accepted one among gastroenterologists, physiologists have maintained that the mechanism for pain arising from any of the hollow viscera is some disorder of motor...Bibliography1. Prout W: On the nature of the acid and saline matters usually existing in the stomach of animals, Phil. Tr. Roy. Soc. London 144: 45, 1824. Google Scholar2. Davies RE: The metabolism of the acid-secreting stomach, Am. J. Digest. Dis., N. S. 4: 173, 1959. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Bonninger M: Zur Diagnoses des Ulcus ventriculi, Berl. klin. Wchnschr. 45: 396, 1908. Google Scholar4. Hardt LL: Pain in active pathologic processes in stomach and duodenum—gastric and duodenal contractions as the direct cause, J. A. M. A. 70: 837, 1918. CrossrefGoogle Scholar5. Palmer WL: Mechanism of pain in gastric and duodenal ulcer. II. The production of pain by chemical irritants, Arch. Int. Med. 38: 694, 1926. CrossrefGoogle Scholar6. Palmer WL: The "acid-test" in gastric and duodenal ulcer: clinical value of experimental production of the typical distress, J. A. M. A. 88: 1778, 1927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar7. PalmerHeintz WLTE: The mechanism of pain in gastric and duodenal ulcer. VII. Further observations, Arch. Int. Med. 53: 269, 1934. CrossrefGoogle Scholar8. Palmer WL: The pain of peptic ulcer, A. Research Nerv. and Ment. Dis., Proc. 23: 302, 1943. Google Scholar9. Hardy TL: The role of hydrochloric acid in the causation of gastric pain, Lancet 1: 711, 1929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar10. Kinsella VJ: The mechanism of pain production in abdominal visceral disease with special reference to the pains of peptic ulcer, M. J. Australia 1: 64, 1928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar11. Kinsella VJ: Some problems of the normal and pathologic physiology of the stomach, Lancet 1: 1130, 1929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar12. BonneyPickering GLGW: Observations on the mechanism of pain in ulcer of the stomach and duodenum. I. The nature of the stimulus, Clin. Sc. 6: 65, 1946. Google Scholar13. BonneyPickering GLGW: Observations on the mechanism of pain in ulcer of the stomach and duodenum. II. The localization of pain nerve endings, Clin. Sc. 6: 91, 1946. MedlineGoogle Scholar14. Christensen O: Pathophysiology of hunger pains—gastrographic and titrimetric investigations, Acta med. Scandinav. Suppl. 37: 1931. Google Scholar15. WoodwardShapiro ERH: Relationship of ulcer pain to pH and motility of stomach and duodenum, Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med. 86: 504, 1954. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Ortmayer M: Gastric motor activity in patients with peptic ulcer, Arch. Int. Med. 35: 423, 1925. CrossrefGoogle Scholar17. Faber K: Das chronische juxtapylorische Magengeschwür, Med. Klinik. Jahrg 9: 1359, 1913. Google Scholar18. Hurst AF: The sensibility of the alimentary canal, 1911, H. Frowde and Hodder & Stoughton, London. Google Scholar19. Carlson AJ: Contributions to the physiology of the stomach. XLIV. The origin of the epigastric pains in cases of gastric and duodenal ulcer, Am. J. Physiol. 45: 81, 1917. CrossrefGoogle Scholar20. ReynoldsMcClure LCW: Motor phenomena occurring in normal stomachs in the presence of peptic ulcer and its pain as observed fluoroscopically, Arch. Int. Med. 29: 1, 1922. CrossrefGoogle Scholar21. Wilson MJ: Duodenal ulcer. Observations on the behavior of stomach and duodenum in the presence of pain, Arch. Int. Med. 41: 633, 1928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar22. Ryle JA: Gastric function in health and disease, 1926, Milford, London. Google Scholar23. DragstedtPalmer LRWL: Direct observations on the mechanism of pain in duodenal ulcer, Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med. 29: 753, 1932. CrossrefGoogle Scholar24. MeschanQuigley IJP: Spontaneous motility of the pyloric sphincter and adjacent regions of the gut in the unanesthetized dog, Am. J. Physiol. 121: 350, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar25. Quigley JP: Motor physiology of the stomach, the pylorus and the duodenum; with special reference to gastro-duodenal ulcer, Arch. Surg. 44: 414, 1942. CrossrefGoogle Scholar26. QuigleyReadRadzowMeschanWerle JPMRKHIJM: The effect of hydrochloric acid on the pyloric sphincter and adjacent portions of the digestive tract and on the process of gastric evacuation, Am. J. Physiol. 137: 153, 1942. CrossrefGoogle Scholar27. BrodyQuigley DAJP: Application of the inductograph to the registration of movements, particularly of body structures such as the pyloric sphincter, J. Lab. and Clin. Med. 29: 863, 1944. Google Scholar28. Quigley JP: Gastric motility and gastric evacuation, with special references to peptic ulcer, in Peptic ulcer, edited by D. J. Sandweiss, 1951, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp. 75-82. Google Scholar29. DragstedtOwens LRFM: Supradiaphragmatic section of the vagus nerves in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med. 53: 152, 1943. CrossrefGoogle Scholar30. RuffinGrimsonSmith JMKSRC: The effect of transthoracic vagotomy upon the clinical course of patients with peptic ulcer, Gastroenterology 7: 599, 1946. MedlineGoogle Scholar31. RuffinWhite JMDP: The present status of vagotomy in the treatment of peptic ulcer, Gastroenterology 8: 607, 1948. Google Scholar32. ThorntonStorerDragstedt TFEHLR: Supradiaphragmatic section of the vagus nerves: effect on gastric secretion and motility in patients with peptic ulcer, J. A. M. A. 130: 764, 1946. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33. MooreChapmanSchulzJones FDWPMDCM: Vagus resection in peptic ulcer: physiologic effects and clinical results, J. A. M. A. 133: 741, 1947. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34. BrodyQuigley DAJP: Intralumen pressures of the stomach and duodenum in health and disease, Gastroenterology 9: 570, 1947. MedlineGoogle Scholar35. SmithRuffinBaylin RCJMGJ: The effect of transthoracic vagus resection upon patients with peptic ulcer, South. M. J. 40: 1, 1947. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36. TexterRuffin ECJM: Drugs affecting the autonomic nervous system—clinical application in gastrointestinal disorders, Parts I and II, South. M. J. 49: 910, 1076, 1956. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37. DoddsOuldDailey DCCSME: The effect of tetraethyl ammonium chloride on gastric motility in man, Gastroenterology 10: 1007, 1948. MedlineGoogle Scholar38. ChapmanStranburgJones WPJBCM: The effect of tetraethyl ammonium on the small bowel in man, J. Clin. Investigation 27: 34, 1948. CrossrefGoogle Scholar39. BinterRankin PATJ: The relief of peptic ulcer pain by tetraethyl ammonium chloride, Ann. Int. Med. 33: 649, 1950. LinkGoogle Scholar40. KaySmith AWAN: Effect of hexamethonium iodine on gastric secretion and motility, Brit. M. J. 1: 460, 1950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41. ScottKayO'HareSimpson LDAWMMJA: Hexamethonium bromide in duodenal ulcer, Brit. M. J. 2: 1470, 1950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42. Paton WD: The paralysis of autonomic ganglia with special reference to the therapeutic effects of ganglionic blocking drugs, Brit. M. J. 1: 773, 1951. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar43. LegertonTexterRuffin CWECJM: The mechanism of relief of pain in peptic ulcer by Banthine, South. M. J. 45: 310, 1952. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar44. RuffinBaylinLegertonTexter JMGJCWEC: Mechanism of pain in peptic ulcer, Gastroenterology 23: 252, 1953. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar45. TexterSmithBarborka ECHWCJ: Studies on ulcer pain. I. The role of gastric intestinal motor activity, in Memoria v Congresco Panamericano de Gastroenterologia, Viernes 20 al 27 de Enero de 1956, La Habana, Cuba, P. Fernandez y Cia, En C. Hospital 619, La Habana, 1956, Tomo II, pp. 1130-1134. Google Scholar46. SmithTexterStickleyBarborka HWECJHCJ: Intraluminal pressures from the upper gastrointestinal tract. II. Correlations with gastroduodenal motor activity in normal subjects and patients with ulcer distress, Gastroenterology 32: 1025, 1957. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar47. TexterVantrappenLiemerBarborka ECGMDCJ: Methods for studying gastrointestinal motility, Quart. Bull., Northwestern Univ. M. School 32: 281, 1958. Google Scholar48. VantrappenLiemerTexter GMDEC: Fluorocinematography and intraluminal pressure recordings in the study of esophageal motor activity; method and perspectives, Federation Proc. 17: 167, 1958. Google Scholar49. VantrappenLiemerIkeyaTexterBarborka GMDJECCJ: Simultaneous fluorocinematography and intraluminal pressure measurements in the study of esophageal motility, Gastroenterology 35: 592, 1958. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar50. TexterVantrappenLiemerSmith ECGMHW: Gastroduodenal motor response following intragastric administration of HCl to normal subjects and patients with duodenal ulcers, Clin. Res. 6: 143, 1958. Google Scholar51. SmithTexter HWEC: Characteristics of phasic intraluminal pressure waves from the stomach and duodenum—studies in normal subjects and ulcer patients, Am. J. Digest. Dis., N.S. 2: 318, 1957. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar52. TexterIkeya ECJ: Phasic intraluminal pressure waves from the stomach, Federation Proc. 17: 162, 1958. Google Scholar53. HightowerCodeMaher NCCFFT: A method for the study of gastrointestinal motor activity in human beings, Proc. Staff Meet., Mayo Clin. 24: 453, 1949. MedlineGoogle Scholar54. TexterSmith ECHW: Quantitative study of gastrointestinal motor activity, J. Clin. Investigation 35: 739, 1956. Google Scholar55. SmithCodeSchlegel AWCFJF: Simultaneous cineradiographic and kymographic studies of human gastric antral motility, J. Appl. Physiol. 11: 12, 1957. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar56. Voegtlin WL: Gastric acidity in normal individuals and those with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer: an attempt to influence the nocturnal secretion, Gastroenterology 9: 126, 1947. Google Scholar57. LevinKirsnerPalmer EVBWL: A simple measure of gastric secretion in man: comparison of one hour basal secretion, histamine secretion and twelve hour nocturnal secretion, Gastroenterology 19: 88, 1951. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar58. TexterSmithBarborka ECHWCJ: Evaluation of newer anticholinergic agents, Gastroenterology 30: 772, 1956. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar59. Barford LJ: A statistical enquiry into the etiology, symptoms, signs and results of treatment in 166 cases of gastric and duodenal ulcer, Guy's Hosp. Rep. 78: 127, 1928, cited by Christensen.14 Google Scholar60. HurstVenables AFIT: The true incidence of hyperchlorhydria in gastric and duodenal ulcer, Guy's Hosp. Rep. 79: 249, 1929, cited by Christensen.14 Google Scholar61. BrownDolkart CFRE: Gastric acid during recurrence and remissions of duodenal ulcer, Arch. Int. Med. 60: 680, 1937. CrossrefGoogle Scholar62. Marks IN: The relationship of the acid output to the parietal cell population of the stomach, Scottish M. J. 1: 242, 1956. Google Scholar63. Texter EC: Physiology of symptoms. V. Digestive tract pain, Am. J. Digest. Dis., N.S. 3: 877, 1958. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar64. Izzo A: Gastrointestinal tension receptors with unmyelinated afferent fibers in the vagus of the cat, Quart. J. Exper. Physiol. 42: 130, 1957. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar65. BoothHuntMilesMurray MJNJMFA: Comparison of gastric emptying and secretion in men and women with reference to prevalence of duodenal ulcer to each sex, Lancet 1: 657, 1957. CrossrefGoogle Scholar66. HuntKay JNAW: The nature of gastric hypersecretion of acid in patients with duodenal ulcer, Brit M. J. 2: 1444, 1954. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar67. Shay H: The pathologic physiology of gastric and duodenal ulcer, Bull. New York Acad. Med. 20: 264, 1944. MedlineGoogle Scholar68. Hunt JN: Influence of hydrochloric acid on gastric secretion and emptying in patients with duodenal ulcer, Brit M. J. 1: 681, 1957. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar69. Apperly FL: The acidity reduction test versus the fractional test meal, Am. J. Digest Dis. 4: 91, 1937. CrossrefGoogle Scholar70. Boldyreff W: The self-regulation of the acidity of the gastric contents and the real acidity of the gastric juice, Quart J. Exper. Physiol. 8: 1, 1914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar71. WolfWolff SHG: Evidence on the genesis of peptic ulcer in man, J. A. M. A. 120: 670, 1942. CrossrefGoogle Scholar72. WolfWolff SHG: Human gastric function: an experimental study of a man and his stomach, 1947, Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar73. AtkinsonEdwardsHonourRowlands MDAAJEN: Comparison of cardiac and pyloric sphincters, Lancet 2: 918, 1957. CrossrefGoogle Scholar74. WilburKelleyCode DLMLCF: Pressures in the pyloric sphincter of human beings, Federation Proc. 18: 170, 1959. Google Scholar75. PortisJaffe SARH: A study of peptic ulcer based on necropsy records, J. A. M. A. 110: 6, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar76. Doret JP: Contribution a l'etude de la motricité normale et pathologique de l'estomac analyseé par la gastrographie, Gastroenterologia 77: 231, 1952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Chicago, Illinois*Received for publication May 12, 1959.Presented at the Fortieth Annual Session of The American College of Physicians, Chicago, Illinois, April 20, 1959.From the Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Research Hospital, Passavant Memorial Hospital, and Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.†This investigation was supported by grants from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation, the Smith, Kline and French Foundation, the Lakeland Foundation, the James Picker Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service (RG 4633-C2 Physiology and 2A-5094-C1 National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases), G. D. Searle and Company, A. H. Robins Company, and the Gastroenterology Research Fund.‡With the technical assistance of (Mrs.) JUNKO MIZUTA, B.S., Chicago, Illinois.Requests for reprints should be addressed to E. Clinton Texter, Jr., M.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago 11, Illinois. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byHypersenstivity to Acid in Ulcer-Like Functional DyspepsiaBlocked and nonblocked acid secretion and reported pain in ulcer, nonulcer dyspepsia, and normal subjectsUlcer Pain Mechanisms the Clinical Features of Active Peptic Ulcer Disease and Implications for TherapyAcid perfusion of duodenal ulcer craters and ulcer pain: a controlled double blind study.Pain experience and acid secretion in gastrointestinal disorders: A comparison of ulcer and nud patientsPain in Peptic UlcerMagenbeschwerden ohne organischen BefundFluorocinematography 1 December 1959Volume 51, Issue 6Page: 1275-1294KeywordsGastric ulcersGastroenterology and hepatologyHospital medicineHydrochloric acidMucous membranesPeptic ulcersPrevention, policy, and public healthResearch fundingStomachUlcers ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 1 December 1959 PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TEXTER et al. (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: