Why the study?
Does thoracic epidural analgesia improve postoperative pain control compared to fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing major open surgical procedures?
Does thoracic epidural analgesia improve postoperative pain control compared to fascial plane blocks in patients undergoing major open surgical procedures?
The authors argue that thoracic epidural analgesia should remain the preferred method for postoperative pain control in major open surgeries over fascial plane blocks, provided resources and preventive strategies are available.
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an established gold standard for postoperative pain control especially following laparotomy and thoracotomy. The safety and efficacy of TEA is well known when the attention to patient selection is upheld. Recently, the use of fascial plane blocks (FPBs) has evolved as an alternative to TEA most likely because these blocks avoid problems such as neurological comorbidity, coagulation disorders, epidural catheter failure and hypotension due to sympathetic denervation. However, if an FPB is performed, postoperative monitoring and adjuvant treatments are still necessary. Also, the true efficacy of FPBs is questioned. Thus, should we prioritize less efficient analgesic regimens with FPBs when preventive treatment strategies for epidural catheter failure and hypotension exist for TEA? It is time to promote and underscore the benefits of TEA provided to patients undergoing major open surgical procedures. In our mind, FPBs and landmark-guided techniques should be limited to less extensive surgery and when either neuraxial blockade is contraindicated or resources for optimal epidural catheter placement and maintenance are not available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bachman et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: