Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
August 28, 2026Journal of Visualized Experiments

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Leo Baby and Atlas Stents for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Embolization Outcomes and Complications

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HZHao ZhuJXJiajia XuYWYang Wang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective study demonstrates similar occlusion rates between Leo Baby and Atlas stents in intracranial aneurysms, indicating comparable clinical efficacy across device designs.

Key Points

  • To compare embolization outcomes and procedure-related complications between the Neuroform Atlas and Leo Baby stents in patients undergoing stent-assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysms.
  • Retrospective comparative analysis of 96 consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated between January 2022 and December 2023 with either the Atlas stent (n=46) or the Leo Baby stent (n=50).
  • Evaluated immediate post-procedural angiographic occlusion, 6-month Raymond grade distribution, 1-year functional status via modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and peri-procedural complications.
  • Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 89.1% of the Atlas cohort versus 88.0% of the Leo Baby cohort (P = 0.3281), with no significant difference in 6-month Raymond grade distribution (P = 0.5067).
  • Favorable functional outcomes at 1 year (mRS score 0–2) occurred in >90% of patients in both groups (P = 0.1528).
  • Peri-procedural complications occurred in 28.2% of Atlas patients versus 12.0% of Leo Baby patients (P = 0.0857), though post-hoc power analysis revealed only 42% power to detect this difference.

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9145c5d15324a1df3a8fe5https://doi.org/10.3791/71816
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share