Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study finds estimated fetal weight growth velocity does not improve adverse outcome prediction in small term fetuses, indicating limited clinical utility beyond standard Doppler.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether estimated fetal weight (EFW) growth velocity (GV), assessed using interval-specific standards, provides additional prediction beyond standard criteria for identifying adverse outcomes in term foetuses with EFW < 10th centile. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary perinatal centre. POPULATION: A cohort of 600 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with EFW < 10th above 32 weeks and term delivered. METHODS: GV between the diagnosis of SGA (EFW < 10th centile) and the last ultrasound before delivery was defined according to interval-specific standards in cases with at least two scans ≥ 14 days apart. Slow GV was considered the threshold for a 10% false positive rate for detecting SGA at birth according to published references [Hugh O. 2022]. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) was defined if: EFW < 3rd centile, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5th centile, or umbilical or uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) ≥ 95th centile. Slow GV was defined below the 10th centile adjusted for gestational age. Logistic regression analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A composite adverse outcome (CAO) comprising neonatal morbidity or preeclampsia. RESULTS: Slow GV was observed in 31.8% of cases. No significant differences were observed between groups in maternal characteristics, gestational age at diagnosis. At the last scan, foetuses with slow GV more frequently had an EFW < 3rd centile (52.4% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001) and BW < 3rd centile (51.6% vs. 62.8; p < 0.05) and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (4.2% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.023). No differences were observed in CAO rates (22.7% vs. 26.6%; p = 0.689). In multivariable analysis, EFW < 3rd centile, abnormal UtA-PI, and low CPR were independent predictors of CAO. Adding slow GV did not improve predictive performance (AUC 0.64 vs. 0.64; p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: In term foetuses with EFW < 10th centile, slow EFW GV does not enhance the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes beyond established Doppler and biometric criteria, questioning its clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: