Qualitative study reveals how coordinating religious and professional meanings mitigates chronic business stress in Chinese entrepreneurs, highlighting global meaning as a dynamic coping system.
Entrepreneurs often face persistent, uncontrollable stressors, yet research has prioritised problem- and emotion-focused coping over meaning-making processes. Drawing on Park and Folkman’s global-situational framework, this qualitative study examines how religious (Buddhist) and professional (entrepreneurial) meanings interact in coping among Chinese Buddhist entrepreneurs. Based on semi-structured interviews with 22 interviewees, we identify two families of interaction mechanisms: overriding (prioritising Buddhist meanings when entrepreneurial frames fail, e.g. interpreting outcomes through karma or elevating religious goals over profit) and intertwined (integrating meanings, e.g. pairing non-attachment with perseverance to sustain effort while reducing outcome fixation). These mechanisms generate situational meanings that render adversity bearable without abandoning entrepreneurial commitments. The study advances meaning-making coping by showing that it involves coordinating multiple components within global meaning, not merely reconstructing situational appraisals. We reconceptualise global meaning as a dynamic, negotiable system where stability and flexibility coexist, illustrating how religious resources support rather than substitute for entrepreneurial logics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: