Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective surveillance study observes high rates of recurrent and contact-related lateral ankle sprains in collegiate basketball players, highlighting a need for targeted prevention.
Objectives To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and injury mechanisms of lateral ankle sprain (LAS) among Japanese collegiate men’s basketball players over seven competitive seasons and describe the epidemiological characteristics relevant to injury prevention.Methods Injury surveillance data were obtained from the Kanto Collegiate Basketball Federation across the 2018/2019 and 2024/2025 seasons (27 team-seasons). LAS were extracted from all reported injuries classified according to the International Olympic Committee consensus statement on injury surveillance. Proportional differences in injury history, contact mechanism, movement type, and time loss (days absent from participation) were analyzed.Results Of the 269 reported ankle sprains, 247 (91.8%) involved LAS. The median time loss was 6 days. Recurrent injuries accounted for 55.1% of LAS cases and resulted in a significantly longer time loss than new injuries (p = 0.022). Contact-related LAS accounted for 64% of the cases, with stepping on another player’s foot being the most common mechanism (32%). Jumping was the most frequent movement-associated mechanism (35.2%), resulting in greater time loss than agility-related injuries (p = 0.023).Conclusion LAS is highly prevalent among Japanese collegiate men’s basketball players. The findings highlight the need for preventive strategies that address LAS and extrinsic injury mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: