Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation demonstrates improved material classification in engineering records, indicating enhanced reliability for heterogeneous construction supply data.
Construction material descriptions in engineering projects are often heterogeneous due to inconsistent naming conventions, supplier-specific terminology, and incomplete specification information, making it difficult to automatically map non-standard descriptions to standardized material dictionaries. Existing rule-based approaches rely heavily on manually constructed rules and predefined dictionaries, limiting their adaptability, whereas direct large language model (LLM)-based methods often lack domain-specific constraints, resulting in less reliable material classification and attribute decomposition. To address these challenges, this paper proposes LLM-MSMA, an LLM-based multi-agent framework for construction material classification and attribute decomposition. The framework adopts a multi-scale task decomposition strategy that integrates hybrid retrieval, logic validation, and template-guided attribute decomposition. Hybrid retrieval generates candidate material categories, which are subsequently refined through LLM-based semantic reasoning. A Logic Validation Agent further verifies classification results using engineering rules, while an Attribute Decomposition Agent extracts structured material attributes according to classification-specific templates. The proposed framework is evaluated using a real-world bill-of-materials dataset containing 2912 material records collected from a large-scale engineering project as a case study. Experimental results show that, compared with the rule-based baseline, LLM-MSMA improves material classification accuracy by 43.39 percentage points and increases the attribute decomposition F1-score by 68.89 percentage points. Compared with the direct LLM baseline, the proposed framework further improves material classification accuracy by 8.24 percentage points and the attribute decomposition F1-score by 7.31 percentage points, while achieving an Exact Match Accuracy of 82.83%. These results indicate that combining hybrid retrieval with domain-specific structured knowledge and multi-agent LLM reasoning improves the reliability of construction material classification and attribute decomposition for heterogeneous material descriptions within the evaluated engineering context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: