Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase 2 clinical trial demonstrates safety and notable pathologic responses in resectable colon cancer, suggesting effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy across mismatch repair subtypes.
PURPOSE: Effective immunotherapy for mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (CRC) is lacking. We examined the safety and efficacy of the novel next-generation immune activator/Fc-enhanced CTLA-4 inhibitor botensilimab (BOT) plus PD-1 inhibitor balstilimab (BAL) in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or older with non-metastatic CRC awaiting surgical resection were eligible. BOT/BAL was administered followed by surgical resection. In cohort A, patients received BOT 75 mg d1 and BAL 240 mg d1, 15; in cohorts B/C, patients received 2 additional BAL doses (d29, 43). The primary study objectives were safety, feasibility (based on surgery delay), and pathologic response. Exploratory analyses examined changes in the tumor microenvironment. RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible patients (26 tumors, n=22 pMMR; n=4 dMMR) were enrolled (two patients had synchronous primary tumors). Neoadjuvant BOT/BAL was safe and did not delay planned surgery in any patient. The major pathologic response rate was 41% (95% CI, 21%-64%) for pMMR, and 100% (95% CI, 40%-100%) for dMMR CRC. BOT/BAL was associated with significant anti-tumor effects in the tumor microenvironment, with an increase in the density and proportion of CD8+ T cells, a reduction in tumor infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs, and evidence of increased immune cell-cell interaction in responding patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate safety, feasibility, and encouraging pathological responses for BOT/BAL in both non-metastatic pMMR and dMMR CRC. Tumor microenvironment remodeling suggests a robust anti-tumor immune response induced by immunotherapy. These data support the continued development of BOT/BAL in CRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: