Benchmarking study demonstrates that graph-calibrated differential privacy improves utility while curbing attribute inference in correlated IoT data, highlighting stronger stream privacy.
Internet of Things (IoT) streams contain temporal, spatial, and cross-channel dependencies that can support inference about an attribute even after a formally private release. Standard differential privacy does not assume statistical independence; its guarantee is relative to a declared neighboring relation and may protect a narrower unit than the secret of practical interest. This paper proposes Graph-Calibrated Differential Privacy (GC-DP), which uses a lag-aware component graph to rank empirical exposure, construct conservative component scores, and allocate a release budget. The formal mechanism fixes a graph-expanded input adjacency independently of the protected data and calibrates each released coordinate to a certified global sensitivity bound. The graph, threshold, empirical-influence scores, and utility scores are obtained from public calibration information or through an explicitly composed private-calibration budget. For the latter case, the paper specifies a bounded-vector Laplace calibration mechanism and separates its budget from the release budget. Experiments on four public IoT datasets evaluate downstream utility, attribute-inference performance, ablations, and computational cost. All reported values are empirical measurements averaged over ten independent noise draws. Under the evaluated component-occurrence adjacency and public-calibration protocol, GC-DP achieves higher task utility and lower attribute-inference performance than the included uniform and partially adaptive baselines across the tested privacy budgets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: