Theoretical analysis uncovers a cyclic information-transport mechanism bridging cosmic aeons, indicating conscious observers generate experiential meaning while algorithms preserve structural data.
The concept of the Steward of Being outlines a third way between theistic personalism and nihilistic materialism. The starting point is the epistemological insight that truth is a perspectival synthesis of harmonious and disharmonious world structures, wherein evil is included as a real capacity for disruption. The model asks: Which instance could collect the raw data of these structures, transport them across the boundaries of a cosmic cycle (aeon), and make them available for the next round? This instance – the Steward – is not a translator, but a blind, broadly collecting, and selectively compressing transporter – an algorithm. It gathers the factual and counterfactual traces of all experience without evaluating, feeling, or interpreting them. The actual translation – the synthesis of harmony and dissonance, the determination of evil, and the meaning-making of experience – is reserved for conscious creatures, who alone possess the necessary standpoint. Drawing on Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC), this process is conceived cyclically: the collected raw data are fed through the mass-free end-state of an aeon into the parameters of future cycles. The text discusses the consequences for freedom, suffering, and meaning making. At its center stands the inversion of Whitehead's concept of God: The Steward is not God, but a soulless algorithm; it is not the originator of truth, but its blind courier. The human being transforms from a companion into a conductor – not because they master the Steward, but because they first give it the content it can carry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walter Billig (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: