Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study demonstrates dynamic conversion of workflow descriptions into agentic tools, highlighting improved reproducibility and scalability for large language model analyses.
Summary Large Language Models (LLM) can orchestrate computational analyses through agentic systems, but scaling their toolsets remains a barrier because tool definitions are often hard coded into agent implementation. We developed Command-line LLM-agent Adapter (Coala), a standards-based framework that bridges the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Common Workflow Language (CWL). Coala turns CWL tool descriptions into MCP-compatible, LLM-accessible schemas, treating tool definitions as data rather than code. Tools are then executed in containerized environments through a generic MCP server, which separates the agent’s reasoning from tool execution. This framework improves reproducibility, reduces ongoing maintenance burden, and enables interactive access to local command-line tools through natural-language queries. Availability and Implementation Coala is available at https://coala.info and is openly developed on GitHub: https://github.com/coala-info/coala. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: