Conceptual analysis reveals atheism as an existential baseline for theological grammar in post-Christendom contexts, highlighting the need to ground religious discourse in shared finitude.
How can theology maintain credibility when belief in God is optional? This article argues that atheism functions as the existential ground for credible theological grammar in post-Christendom contexts. Examining Tomáš Halík’s recuperation of atheism as ‘impatience with God’ and Emmanuel Falque’s phenomenological treatment of ‘seeing nothing’ as the fundamental human condition, I propose that experiential atheism constitutes theology’s methodological imperative. Grounded in incarnational logic, credible theology must begin with shared finitude rather than transcendent certainties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Kočí (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: