Theoretical model demonstrates an ordered tidal-to-atmospheric coupling sequence in seismically active regions, highlighting falsifiable testing methods for pre-seismic environmental anomalies.
This bilingual English–Spanish paper proposes a testable Tidal–Lithospheric–Radon–Atmospheric Coupling hypothesis linking lunar and solar tidal stress, crustal permeability and microfracturing, radon-222 release, near-surface atmospheric ionization, aerosol processes and possible atmospheric anomalies. The model does not claim that tides cause earthquakes or that cloud formations can predict seismic events. Instead, it proposes a multiparametric experimental framework to investigate whether an ordered temporal sequence — tidal stress → crustal response → radon anomaly → atmospheric ionization/aerosol anomaly → possible atmospheric signature → seismic event — occurs more frequently than expected by chance. The paper discusses falsifiable predictions, meteorological confounders and an observational protocol involving radon, atmospheric variables, tidal calculations and seismic catalogues. English version followed by Spanish version.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan Sebastián Baena Cock (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: