OBJECTIVE: To investigate how self-reported sport-related concussion history affects health-related quality of life in collegiate athletes. DESIGN: Cross sectional. SETTING: Division I university, Division II university, and a junior college. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred two collegiate athletes (210 men, 92 women). ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Participants completed a demographic information sheet and concussion history form; they were then grouped by number of previous self-reported concussions, designated as 0, 1-2, or 3+. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Medical Outcomes Short Form (SF-36) and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). RESULTS: Significant differences between groups were found for the bodily pain, vitality, and social functioning subscales of the SF-36. The 3+ group had significantly lower scores for bodily pain (48.1 ± 8.9) compared with the 1-2 group (P = 0.028, 52.1 ± 7.7) and 0 group (P < 0.01, 53.5 ± 8.3), for vitality (52.4 ± 8.4) compared with the 0 group (P = 0.011, 55.9 ± 8.6), and for social functioning (48.5 ± 9.4) compared with the 1-2 group (P = 0.028, 51.6 ± 7.3) and 0 group (P = 0.003, 51.9 ± 8.1). Significant differences were noted on the HIT-6 total score. The 3+ group reported greater impact of headache (46.7 ± 6.4) than the 1-2 group (P = 0.05, 44.6 ± 6.4) and 0 group (P < 0.001, 42.9 ± 5.8). The 1-2 group also had higher HIT-6 scores than the 0 group (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that a collegiate athlete's perception of bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, and headache is adversely affected by previous sport-related concussions. However, by incorporating general and specific outcome measures into the standard evaluation of sport-related concussion, the clinician can better determine how the athlete is responding to treatment and recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuehl et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: