Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have examined the ability of several class II-positive tumor cell transfectants to stimulate murine Th1 clones. Most of the transfectants failed to activate the Th1 clones and, in fact, induced Ag-specific anergy. However, we found that one tumor, a UV-induced fibrosarcoma (6130-VAR1), was capable of stimulating both cytokine production and proliferation in Th1 clones. We believe that 6130-VAR1 cells possess a unique costimulatory activity for the following reasons. First, these cells fail to express known costimulatory molecules including B7-1 and B7-2. Second, 6130-VAR1-mediated stimulation of Th1 clones was not blocked by anti-CD28 Fab or by CTLA4Ig, which suggests that members of the B7 family were not up-regulated during the course of stimulation and that activation does not occur via a CD28-dependent pathway. Third, 6130-VAR1 could provide costimulation when presented on a different surface than the class II/peptide ligand for the TCR. This last finding suggested that the activity on these cells was not simply an adhesion molecule that facilitated increased efficiency of T cell:MHC interactions. Finally, like B7-1 transfectants, stimulation by class II-positive 6130-VAR1 cells prevented the induction of anergy in the Th1 clones. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that 6130-VAR1 expresses a unique costimulatory activity (VAM-1) that, like B7-1, can promote T cell activation and prevent anergy induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuckerman et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: