Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study describes the distinct roles of B7 and LFA-3 in the regulation of T cell responses. Activation of CD4+ T cells with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-DR4/B7 and CHO-DR4/LFA-3 cells that present the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin A resulted in significant T cell proliferation and substantial production of TNF and IFN-gamma. Strong IL-2 production was recorded in B7-costimulated, but not LFA-3-costimulated, cultures. The presence of B7 induced a more vigorous and prolonged proliferative T cell response compared with LFA-3 costimulation. In contrast, LFA-3 was more efficient than B7 in mediating cell adhesion of CD4+ T cells. Costimulation with the CHO-DR4/B7/LFA-3 triple transfectant resulted in enhanced cell adhesion, proliferation, and cytokine production compared with either DR4/B7 or DR4/LFA-3 alone. Optimal production of IL-2 by naive and memory CD4+ T cells was seen only when cells were costimulated with B7, whereas IFN-gamma production was induced in memory cells by both LFA-3 and B7. The Jurkat T cell line responded to CHO-DR4/B7/LFA-3 in a manner similar to peripheral blood CD4+ T cells. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of Jurkat cells stimulated with staphylococcal enterotoxin E and the different CHO transfectants revealed that the cooperative effect of B7 and LFA-3 on IL-2 production was also seen at the mRNA level. The large amounts of IL-2 produced by B7 costimulation indicate a paracrine function of the B7/CD28 pathway, whereas the LFA-3/CD2 pathway provides strong adhesion and may facilitate autocrine T cell expansion. Combined expression of the B7 and LFA-3 molecules seems to provide an optimal Ag-presenting function that ensures strong adhesion and optimal signal transduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parra et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: