The paper offers a comparative study of numerical methods of analysis of electromagnetic fields. The focus is on the finite element method (FEM) and finite integration technique (FIT), but with the cell and equivalent network approaches also considered. It is shown how the approximate integrals describing coefficients of the FEM need to be derived for a mesh with parallelepiped elements to achieve consistency with FIT equations. The equivalence of FEM and FIT formulations for a triangular mesh in 2D is highlighted. The TEAM Workshops Problem No. 7 is used as an example for numerical comparisons. Two formulations have been considered: 1) using the edge values of the magnetic vector potentialAand the nodal values of the electric scalar potentialV; and 2) expressed in terms of the edge values of both magneticAand electricT-T0vector potentials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demenko et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: