Key result
ELISA D-dimer assay provided a sensitivity of 70% and negative predictive value of 72% for diagnosing coronary artery disease at a 270 ng/ml threshold, values considered too low for diagnosis.
Why the study?
Does ELISA D-dimer assay accurately diagnose angiographically determined coronary artery disease in patients with unstable angina pectoris?
Observational (n=54)
Does ELISA D-dimer assay accurately diagnose angiographically determined coronary artery disease in patients with unstable angina pectoris?
ELISA D-dimer is not sufficiently sensitive or specific to diagnose coronary artery disease in patients with unstable angina, though it may correlate with disease severity.
ELISA D-dimer assay lacks diagnostic accuracy in unstable angina; cohort data leave open possible correlation with CAD severity.
Unstable angina pectoris is associated with elevated D-dimer levels. However, the operating characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) of the D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) are unknown. Using a prospective, observational design, we collected blood from 54 patients with unstable angina pectoris at admission and assayed for ELISA D-dimer levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive prediction values for angiographically determined coronary artery disease were calculated at multiple discriminate levels. All patients underwent coronary catheterization. A statistically significant correlation was noted between ELISA D-dimer levels and age, male sex, hypertension, use of beta-blocker, fibrinogen levels and catheterization findings. No correlation was noted between ELISA D-dimer levels and degree of the coronary artery disease. Best results were provided at a discriminate level of 270 ng/ml, with sensitivity 70%, negative predictive value 72%, and overall accuracy 67%. All discriminate levels, however, provided values too low for diagnosis. In conclusion, ELISA D-dimer assay is a non-sensitive, non-specific test for coronary artery disease as defined by coronary catheterization. However, the assay adds information regarding the severity of disease in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shitrit et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Unstable angina pectoris (n=54). ELISA D-dimer assay was evaluated on Diagnosis of angiographically determined coronary artery disease. ELISA D-dimer assay provided a sensitivity of 70% and negative predictive value of 72% for diagnosing coronary artery disease at a 270 ng/ml threshold, values considered too low for diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: