This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Because secondhand smoke is a public health concern, many colleges have adopted bans to ensure healthier environments. This study demonstrates how outdoor smoking policy change can be accomplished at a large public university. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 1,537 students housed in residential communities at the University of California, Berkeley, who completed an online survey. METHODS: A proposal for smoke-free residential communities that included student resident survey data was prepared. RESULTS: The survey data indicated that most students (77%) were bothered by secondhand smoke, and most (66%) favored smoke-free environments. The data were used to advocate for a change in the residential community smoking policy. CONCLUSION: The survey data and institutional comparisons played a key role in administrators' decision-making about campus smoking policy. Despite administrators' concerns about students' safety and freedom of choice, student-led advocacy was able to influence policy change.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: