Key result
Global management of ischemic heart disease should combine primary and secondary prevention measures directed at long-term risk reduction with optimal revascularization therapies.
Why the study?
Does a global management strategy combining prevention and selective revascularization improve outcomes compared to routine isolated revascularization in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Does a global management strategy combining prevention and selective revascularization improve outcomes compared to routine isolated revascularization in patients with ischemic heart disease?
The evolving understanding of atherosclerosis as a widespread inflammatory process and the role of microvascular dysfunction supports a comprehensive medical management strategy over routine isolated revascularization for stable ischemic heart disease.
Supports integrated prevention with revascularization in IHD; leaves open superiority over isolated procedures in randomized trials.
In recent years, our understanding of the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease has evolved greatly. Atherosclerosis, traditionally considered a focal cholesterol storage disease, is now viewed as a widespread inflammatory process, responsible for the development, evolution and complications of arterial lesions. It is now recognized that most atherosclerotic lesions grow outward; thus, a substantial burden of atherosclerosis can exist in the absence of stenosis. Moreover, intravascular ultrasound and autopsy studies have indicated that vulnerable plaques are usually represented by mildly obstructive lesions. In the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease, particular attention has been focused on endothelial and microvascular function. Structural or functional alterations of coronary microcirculation have been documented in several clinical conditions, such as stable and unstable angina. In this clinical setting, microvascular dysfunction acts not only as an independent risk marker, but can also contribute to the precipitation or maintenance of myocardial ischemia, even in the absence of coronary atherosclerosis. These observations challenge the traditional hemodynamic approach to the treatment of ischemic heart disease based on the degree of arterial stenosis. Isolated revascularization of a coronary artery can relieve angina and ischemia caused by a flow-limiting stenosis, but is often unable to protect against future atherothrombotic events or to modify the natural history of disease. Recent randomized trials have confirmed these pathophysiological findings, revealing no advantage of a routine over a selective invasive strategy in the treatment of stable angina. Global management of ischemic heart disease should aim to combine primary and secondary prevention measures directed at long-term risk reduction, with optimal revascularization therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orsini et al. (2010) conducted a review in ischemic heart disease. Global management of ischemic heart disease should combine primary and secondary prevention measures directed at long-term risk reduction with optimal revascularization therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: