Key result
Managing lifestyle change after a cardiac event involves a complex transition in self-identity and an ongoing reassessment of past, present, and future lives, emphasizing the need for person-centered care.
Systematic Review (n=500)
Lifestyle change after a cardiac event is a complex process involving a shift in self-identity and experiential learning, highlighting the need for person-centered care that addresses both psychological and physical dimensions of recovery.
Clinicians should address self-identity shifts in post-cardiac lifestyle counseling; extends qualitative synthesis supporting person-centered rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease is an incurable condition. The only approach known to slow its progression is healthy lifestyle change and concordance with cardio-protective medicines. Few people fully succeed in these daily activities so potential health improvements are not fully realised. Little is known about peoples' experiences of managing lifestyle change. The aim of this study was to synthesise qualitative research to explain how participants make lifestyle change after a cardiac event and explore this within the wider illness experience. METHODS: A qualitative synthesis was conducted drawing upon the principles of meta-ethnography. Qualitative studies were identified through a systematic search of 7 databases using explicit criteria. Key concepts were identified and translated across studies. Findings were discussed and diagrammed during a series of audiotaped meetings. RESULTS: The final synthesis is grounded in findings from 27 studies, with over 500 participants (56% male) across 8 countries. All participants experienced a change in their self-identity from what was 'familiar' to 'unfamiliar'. The transition process involved 'finding new limits and a life worth living' , 'finding support for self' and 'finding a new normal'. Analyses of these concepts led to the generation of a third order construct, namely an ongoing process of 'reassessing past, present and future lives' as participants considered their changed identity. Participants experienced a strong urge to get back to 'normal'. Support from family and friends could enable or constrain life change and lifestyle changes. Lifestyle change was but one small part of a wider 'life' change that occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The final synthesis presents an interpretation, not evident in the primary studies, of a person-centred model to explain how lifestyle change is situated within 'wider' life changes. The magnitude of individual responses to a changed health status varied. Participants experienced distress as their notion of self identity shifted and emotions that reflected the various stages of the grief process were evident in participants' accounts. The process of self-managing lifestyle took place through experiential learning; the level of engagement with lifestyle change reflected an individual's unique view of the balance needed to manage 'realistic change' whilst leading to a life that was perceived as 'worth living'. Findings highlight the importance of providing person centred care that aligns with both psychological and physical dimensions of recovery which are inextricably linked.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Astin et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease (n=500). Lifestyle change management was evaluated on Patient experiences and transition process in making lifestyle changes. Managing lifestyle change after a cardiac event involves a complex transition in self-identity and an ongoing reassessment of past, present, and future lives, emphasizing the need for person-centered care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders