Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Under conditions of low-iron stress the plant growth promoting bacterium Pseudomonas putida 589 (DSM 50202) produced a yellow-green fluorescent iron-binding peptide siderophore, which was designated pseudobactin 589 A and had an affinity constant toward Fe3+ of 10(25) at pH 7. Protonated pseudobactin 589 A had the molecular formula C54H78O26N15 and a nominal mass spectral molecular mass of 1353 g/mol. Its structure was determined by a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance, fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry, and Edman degradation. Pseudobactin 589 A consisted of a nonapeptide with the amino acid sequence L-Asp-L-Lys-(D)-beta-OH-Asp-D(L)-Ser-L-Thr-D-Ala-D-Glu-L(D)-Ser-L-N delta-OH- Orn, in which lysine was amide bonded via the carboxy and the N epsilon-amino groups. A quinoline-derived chromophore was connected via an amide bond to the alpha-amino nitrogen of aspartic acid and an L-malamide residue was attached to the chromophore. The three bidentate Fe3+ binding ligands consisted of an o-dihydroxy aromatic group from the quinoline derivative, beta-hydroxyaspartic acid, and an internally cyclized N delta-hydroxyornithine. The structure of pseudobactin 589 A is unique but strikingly similar to that of other pseudobactin-type siderophores from other plant growth promoting and plant deleterious pseudomonads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persmark et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: