Key result
A computer model of the open-circuit acetylene uptake method for measuring cardiac output found negligible error in healthy subjects, but errors up to 20% at rest and 15% during exercise in COPD.
Why the study?
What is the expected error in cardiac output measurements using the open-circuit acetylene uptake method due to ventilation-perfusion inequality in healthy subjects and COPD patients?
What is the expected error in cardiac output measurements using the open-circuit acetylene uptake method due to ventilation-perfusion inequality in healthy subjects and COPD patients?
The open-circuit acetylene uptake method for measuring cardiac output is expected to be accurate in healthy subjects, but its validity in COPD patients is limited by significant ventilation-perfusion inequality errors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution for acetylene uptake cardiac output estimates in COPD; modeling leaves open in vivo validation needs.
The ability to assess cardiac output (Q(T)) noninvasively has been the focus of interest for many researchers. While the open-circuit acetylene (C2H2) method seems promising, it is prone to error due to ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) inequality. Measurements during exercise, at high altitude or in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) could be unreliable and further validation studies under these circumstances may be needed. We used a computer model based on formulae derived from the multiple inert gas elimination technique to quantify error in Q(T) measurements resulting from V/Q inequality at rest, during exercise or at high altitude. Moreover, potential errors encountered in patients with COPD were quantified. In healthy subjects, V/Q inequality related measurement error seems negligible, under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions and especially during exercise. In COPD, errors up to 20% at rest and up to 15% during exercise are expected. It is therefore concluded from our model that the open-circuit C2H2 uptake method is expected to be accurate in normal subjects. Its validity in COPD needs further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogaard et al. (2006) studied Healthy subjects and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Open-circuit acetylene (C2H2) uptake method was evaluated on Error in cardiac output (Q(T)) measurements resulting from V/Q inequality. A computer model of the open-circuit acetylene uptake method for measuring cardiac output found negligible error in healthy subjects, but errors up to 20% at rest and 15% during exercise in COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: