Key result
The review proposes using 'Bone Stress Injury' as a unifying term and recommends radiography as the initial imaging modality, followed by MRI to confirm diagnosis and determine injury grade.
Why the study?
The literature lacks consensus on tibial bone stress injury nomenclature and appropriate imaging modalities, leading to inconsistent communication, diagnosis, and management.
Unified terminology ('Bone Stress Injury') and a standardized imaging approach (initial radiography followed by MRI) are recommended to improve diagnosis and management of atraumatic tibial pain in adolescent athletes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inconsistent tibial BSI nomenclature and imaging may confuse adolescent athlete management; leaves open standardized classification to improve research comparability.
Tibial bone stress injuries (BSIs) are common injuries experienced by active adolescent athletes. The current literature lacks consensus of BSI nomenclature and appropriate use of imaging modalities. Injury classification, severity, or grade may differ substantially according to imaging modalities used and location of injury. This leads to inconsistency in understanding prevalence of injury, communication of diagnosis and management, and can cause confusion for patients and their entourages. As such, the purpose of this Current Concept Review was to identify existing classification of atraumatic tibial pain/BSI, propose unifying nomenclature, and review imaging tools available to clinicians caring for young athletes. Limited literature was identified pertaining to adolescent aged athletes. Thus, we expanded our search to included adult literature and identified 32 publications for atraumatic tibial pain. Multiple grading scales and various imaging modalities were used in the literature highlighting a lack of consensus of terminology and imaging for formalizing diagnosis of BSI. Tibial BSI is common in athletes and has large discrepancies in reported incidence. Unified terminology and recommended imaging modalities for the adolescent athlete with these injuries would improve patient care and professional communication. We propose using “Bone Stress Injury” (BSI) to describe overuse injury of the tibia with associated physical examination findings. When needed for guidance of management, imaging can be used to confirm the diagnosis of BSI. Radiography is recommended as the first imaging modality, and MRI should be considered to confirm diagnosis and determine grade of injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nussbaum et al. (2022) conducted a review in Tibial Bone Stress Injuries. Diagnostic imaging (Radiography, MRI, CT, Ultrasound) was evaluated. The review proposes using 'Bone Stress Injury' as a unifying term and recommends radiography as the initial imaging modality, followed by MRI to confirm diagnosis and determine injury grade.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: