Experimental study demonstrates improved texture and sensory acceptability in cricket-fortified protein bars, indicating edible insects are viable functional protein substitutes.
The trend of consuming high-protein bars is increasing. Edible cricket has recently emerged as a promising alternative protein source that may help address global food challenges. However, the physicochemical, nutritional, textural, and sensory qualities of the cricket protein-enriched bars must be effectively balanced. In this study, whole cricket powder (WC) and defatted cricket powder (DC) were used as protein substitutes at 25% and 50% replacement levels of whey protein in the formulation. Compared with protein bars containing WC, those formulated with DC exhibited higher hardness and lower deformation at fracture, indicating a firmer and comparatively more brittle structure. The overall acceptability of 25% DC protein bar, as evaluated based on physicochemical and sensory attributes, was significantly higher than that of the other products ( p < 0.05). In addition, the results revealed that partial defatting pretreatment of cricket powder, with 32.3% fat removal using ethyl alcohol as a green solvent influenced the desirable properties of the obtained insect-based protein bar, as indicated by the textural analysis and sensory evaluation. The protein bar containing 25% DC exhibited a protein content comparable to that of the whey protein control (37.84 ± 0.88% and 36.32 ± 1.33%, respectively; p ≥ 0.05), whereas its total energy was significantly higher (457.63 ± 4.54 and 443.63 ± 2.00 kcal/100 g, respectively; p < 0.05). Moreover, its water activity (0.54 ± 0.01) was lower than that of control (0.69 ± 0.01), highlighting the potential and benefit of using edible cricket as an ingredient in protein bars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nimitkeatkai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: