Psychometric validation study uncovers a five-dimension scale measuring queen bee syndrome in female subordinates, highlighting direct workplace perceptions to improve leadership research.
Purpose This study develops and validates the Woman Subordinates Perceived Woman Supervisors' Queen Bee Syndrome Scale (SPQBS), a direct, experience-based measure of women supervisors' queen bee syndrome (QBS) grounded in woman subordinates' perception. Design/methodology/approach First, in-depth interviews with woman subordinates informed inductive item generation. Second, an exploratory factor analysis (N = 205) identified the construct's dimensions. Third, a two-wave survey validated the scale via confirmatory factor analysis (N = 309) and tests of criterion-related validity (N = 204). Findings The SPQBS includes five dimensions: alienated relationship, constrained delegation, ineffective communication, ineffective mentoring and constrained development. Each dimension includes three items; thus, the construct comprises 15 items in total. Originality/value The mainstream quantitative studies on QBS have used indirect measures, such as feminine and masculine self-descriptions or increased stereotypical perceptions, labeling women with these features as queen bees without a solid theoretical or phenomenal foundation. SPQBS provides a new way to directly measure QBS by examining woman subordinates' perspectives. This measure has the potential to enrich literature on leadership and diversity, equity and inclusion in workplaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: