Theoretical analysis demonstrates self-consistency in a 64-dimensional framework, suggesting mathematical derivations for fundamental physical constants.
Based on the core number-theoretic anchors of the Yuanxian dimensional-reduction dynamical closed loop — the substance number 4231 and the function number 137 — this paper completes a full mathematical self-consistency calculation and verification of the monistic ontological framework. Starting from the 64-dimensional topological ontology and proceeding through compactification (60-dimensional kernel space), spectral compression (φ⁶²), dimensional-reduction iteration (35 steps) and self-inspection phase locking (68-step period) to four-dimensional manifestation, every intermediate parameter can be derived from the golden-ratio recurrence relation; no additional free parameter is introduced. The following core verifications are completed: (1) magnitude verification and physical anchoring of the substance–function ratio 4231/137≈ 30.88; (2) self-consistency check of the spectral-compression coefficient φ⁶² against the geometric entropy residue of the 60-dimensional kernel space; (3) the relative deviation (approximately 0.026%) between the observational value of the fine-structure constant α≈ 1/137.036 and the integer anchor 137 lies within the first-order approximation error range, the geometric-entropy-residue correction Δα=2.172× 10⁻⁶ having already been rigorously derived in the paper Geometric Entropy Residue; (4) agreement of the first-order Hubble constant H₀ (approximately 68 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹) with the Planck-satellite observational value. The paper proves that substance–function unification is not a numerical coincidence but a rigid conclusion of the mathematical self-consistency and completeness of the Yuanxian dimensional-reduction dynamical closed loop. --- 本文基于元宪理论降维动力学闭环的核心数理锚点——体数4231与用数137,完成了一元本体框架的完整数理自洽性演算与校验。从64维拓扑本体出发,经紧致化(60维核空间)、谱压缩(φ⁶²)、降维迭代(35步)、自检锁相(68步周期)到四维显化的全链条演化,所有中间参数均可通过黄金分割递推关系导出,无额外自由参数。 本文完成以下核心校验:(1)体用比值 4231/137≈ 30.88 的量级验证与物理意义锚定;(2)φ⁶² 谱压缩系数与60维核空间几何熵残余的自洽性检验;(3)精细结构常数观测值 α≈ 1/137.036 与整数锚点137的相对偏差(约0.026%)处于一阶近似误差范围,几何熵残余修正 Δα=2.172× 10⁻⁶ 已由《几何熵残余》论文严格导出;(4)哈勃常数 H₀ 一阶结果(约68 km/s/Mpc)与普朗克卫星观测值的吻合。本文证明:体用归一不是数值巧合,而是元宪降维动力学闭环在数理层面自洽完备的刚性结论。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenyuan Acharya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: