The graphenothermal reduction mechanism of Fe 2 O 3 by graphene oxide (GO) is elucidated through careful experimental analysis. The degree of oxidation (DO) of GO plays a key role in controlling the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 by GO. GO with low DO follows a conventional three-stage reaction path, i.e., ′2GO + Fe 2 O 3 → EG/Fe 3 O 4 (Stage I) → EG/FeO (Stage II) → EG/Fe (Stage III)′ (where EG is exfoliated reduced graphene oxide), at temperatures 650 and 750 °C to reduce Fe 2 O 3, whereas the GO with higher DO transforms rapidly and ceases the reduction at Stage I, i.e., with the formation of EG/Fe 3 O 4 at 650 °C. It is also found that slow thermal treatment of GO continues the reduction to Stage II and further to Stage III depending on time of heating and temperature. EG/Fe 3 O 4 (synthesized at 550 °C, 5 h) by using GO with low DO showed superior cycling performance as an anode of Li-ion battery than its counterpart prepared (at 650 °C, 5 h) from GO with high DO owing to good contacts between EG and Fe 3 O 4 . EG/Fe 3 O 4 (synthesized at 550 °C, 5 h) exhibited reversible capacity as high as 860 mAh/g which is greater than the specific capacity of EG/Fe 3 O 4 synthesized (at 650 °C, 5 h) by 150 mAh/g. Overall, EG/Fe 3 O 4 (synthesized at 550 °C, 5 h) outperformed its counterpart (i.e., EG/Fe 3 O 4 synthesized at 650 °C, 5 h) by exhibiting excellent cycling stability and rate capability at current rates ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petnikota et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: