Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that the modulation of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) ATPase activity by peptides, drugs, and chemosensitizers takes place on a common drug pharmacophore. To this end, a highly emetine-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line was established, in which Pgp constituted 18% of plasma membrane protein. Reconstituted proteoliposomes, the Pgp content of which was up to 40%, displayed a basal activity of 2.6 +/- 0.45 micromol of Pi/min/mg of protein, suggesting the presence of an endogenous Pgp substrate. This basal ATPase activity was stimulated (up to 5.2 micromol of Pi/min/mg of protein) by valinomycin and various Pgp substrates, whereas, to our surprise, gramicidin D, an established Pgp substrate, was inhibitory. Taking advantage of this novel inhibition of Pgp ATPase activity by gramicidin D, a drug competition assay was devised in which gramicidin D-inhibited Pgp ATPase was coincubated with increasing concentrations of various substrates that stimulate its ATPase activity. Gramicidin D inhibition of Pgp ATPase was reversed by Pgp substrates, including various cytotoxic agents and chemosensitizers. The inhibition of the basal ATPase activity and the reversal of gramicidin D inhibition of Pgp ATPase by its various substrates conformed to classical Michaelis-Menten competition. This competition involved an endogenous substrate, the inhibitory drug gramicidin D, and a stimulatory substrate. We conclude that the various MDR type substrates and chemosensitizers compete on a common drug binding site present in Pgp.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borgnia et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: