Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of a sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) for the acquisition of pseudonoise (PN) sequences in chip synchronous direct-sequence spread-spectrum (DS/SS) systems is considered. The out-of-phase sequence is modeled as a random sequence and the probabilities of error and expected sample sizes for the corresponding test are derived. A different (and very commonly used) test is obtained if the out-of-phase sequence is modeled as a zero sequence. The probabilities of error and the expected sample sizes of both SPRT's are compared, and it is shown that the latter test has a significantly larger probability of type I error. Numerical evaluation of the performance of both tests applied to a PN sequence of period 210- 1 gives results in agreement with the analytical results. We conclude that a random sequence is an excellent model for a PN sequence, and that significant degradation in performance can be expected if the test design is based on the zero sequence model rather than on the random sequence model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chawla et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: