Direct dynamics classical trajectory simulations are used to study energy transfer and unimolecular dissociation in collisions of N-protonated glycine, (gly-H) +, with an argon atom and a hydrogenated diamond {111} surface. The (gly-H) + potential is represented by the AM1 semiempirical electronic structure theory and analytic potentials developed previously are used for the diamond surface and the (gly-H) + /Ar and (gly-H) + /diamond intermolecular potentials. The AM1 potential for (gly-H) + gives the same collisional energy transfer distributions as does the AMBER empirical force field. For (gly-H) + + diamond {111} at a collision energy and angle of 70 eV and 45°, the average percent energy transfer to (gly-H) + vibration/rotation, to the surface, and to final ion translation are 12, 38, and 50, respectively. A distribution of (gly-H) + dissociation products are observed in these collisions, with ∼55% of the dissociations occurring while (gly-H) + collides with the surface, i.e., shattering fragmentation. Shattering is initiated when the orientation of (gly-H) + and the “hardness” of the collision “drives” a H-atom from CH 2 to the carbonyl carbon or a H-atom from NH 3 to the carbonyl oxygen or ejects a H 2 molecule from NH 3 . Shattering is not important in (gly-H) + collisions with Ar at 13 eV and an impact parameter of zero, but as found for the surface collisions, the Ar collision may “force” H-atom transfer. The simulations suggest that nonstatistical fragmentation dynamics may be important in the collisional dissociation of protonated amino acids and peptides. The collision may directly “drive” the ion to a fragmentation transition state structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meroueh et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: