Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Even with pegylated (PEG) interferons (IFN), therapy of chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1) remains unsatisfactory. The initial viral response to IFN identifies patients infected with IFN resistant viruses not responding to standard IFN/ribavirin therapy. The impact of primary IFN unresponsiveness for PEG-IFN-alpha-2a/ribavirin therapy is unknown. Viral load was measured in 22 chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1) patients before and 24 h after 9 MU IFN-alpha-2a (days 0 and 1), and before and during weekly 180 microg PEG-IFN-alpha-2a (days 7, 8, 11, 14 and 21) administration. Thereafter, ribavirin (800 mg/d) was added for 6 months. Virological responders continued treatment for a further 6 months. Twenty-eight patients treated with standard IFN/ribavirin therapy in a previous study using an analogous protocol served as historic controls. After 6 months 15 (68.2%) patients were (HCV-RNA) negative, eight of whom (36.4%) had a sustained response. The decrease in viral load 24 h after 9 MU IFN-alpha-2a was greater in virological responders (1.05 log [0.25-1.67]) than in nonresponders (NR) (0.34 [0.14-0.65]; P=0.003). In contrast, viral decline was not different between responders and NRs during the first 2 weeks on PEG-IFN-alpha-2a. All patients with an initial decline > 1.4 log became sustained responders. Five of 12 patients with a log change < 0.8 became end of treatment responders, two had a sustained response. Antiviral response to PEG-IFN-alpha-2a is different to that on standard IFN. In spite of a lower initial response PEG-IFN-alpha-2a/ribavirin combination therapy may overcome predicted IFN unresponsiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jessner et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: