Key result
Structural connectivity (fornix and hippocampal cingulum radial diffusivity) and functional connectivity (salience network) uniquely and independently predicted episodic memory performance in older adults.
Why the study?
The study examined the independent contributions of structural and functional connectivity markers to individual differences in episodic memory performance in cognitively normal older adults.
Cross-Sectional (n=107)
Both structural (DTI) and functional (rsfMRI) connectivity measures uniquely contribute to explaining individual variability in episodic memory function in cognitively normal older adults.
Structural and functional connectivity may relate to memory in normal aging; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
In this study, we examined the independent contributions of structural and functional connectivity markers to individual differences in episodic memory performance in 107 cognitively normal older adults from the BIOCARD study. Structural connectivity, defined by the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measure of radial diffusivity (RD), was obtained from two medial temporal lobe white matter tracts: the fornix and hippocampal cingulum, while functional connectivity markers were derived from network-based resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) of five large-scale brain networks: the control, default, limbic, dorsal attention, and salience/ventral attention networks. Hierarchical and stepwise linear regression methods were utilized to directly compare the relative contributions of the connectivity modalities to individual variability in a composite delayed episodic memory score, while also accounting for age, sex, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology (i.e., Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau181), and gray matter volumes of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Results revealed that fornix RD, hippocampal cingulum RD, and salience network functional connectivity were each significant independent predictors of memory performance, while CSF markers and gray matter volumes were not. Moreover, in the stepwise model, the addition of sex, fornix RD, hippocampal cingulum RD, and salience network functional connectivity each significantly improved the overall predictive value of the model. These findings demonstrate that both DTI and rsfMRI connectivity measures uniquely contributed to the model and that the combination of structural and functional connectivity markers best accounted for individual variability in episodic memory function in cognitively normal older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alm et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cognitively normal older adults (n=107). Structural and functional brain connectivity markers was evaluated on Delayed episodic memory composite score (Fornix RD: β = -0.48; Hippocampal cingulum RD: β = 0.35; Salience network: β = -0.21, p=<0.001, <0.001, and 0.04 respectively). Structural connectivity (fornix and hippocampal cingulum radial diffusivity) and functional connectivity (salience network) uniquely and independently predicted episodic memory performance in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: