Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Swedish Supreme Court delivered this judgment in the context of proceedings that the collective management organization of visual artists in Sweden (Bildupphovsrätt i Sverige ek. för., BUS) had brought against Wikimedia Sverige regarding interpretation of the exception known as freedom of panorama, in particular what is understood by ‘depict’ (‘avbilda’) in s 24(1) of the Swedish Copyright Act.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nedim Malovic (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: