Key result
Isometric dorsiflexion significantly modified local perfusion compared to standing, with photoplethysmography registering a decrease (p=0.028) and laser Doppler flowmetry registering an increase (p=0.028).
Why the study?
Does isometric dorsiflexion alter lower limb microcirculation in healthy subjects?
Does isometric dorsiflexion alter lower limb microcirculation in healthy subjects?
Isometric dorsiflexion in the standing position significantly alters lower limb microcirculation, with differing responses observed between PPG and LDF likely due to measurement depth.
Method-specific perfusion shifts during dorsiflexion advise single-technique caution clinically; leaves open multimodal validation needs in vascular studies.
Blood flow in the lower extremities varies considerably due to changes in pressure from muscle contraction as occurs with calf muscle pump activity. The dorsiflexion is associated with functional walking performance, and its relation with microcirculation of lower limbs has not yet been addressed. In this study we explore the impact of dorsiflexion in the lower limb microcirculation with non-invasive technologies, as near as possible to the normal physiological state. Six (31 9 years) healthy subjects were enrolled in this study after informed written consent. The experimental protocol consisted of 5 minutes standing, 1 minute of dorsiflexor muscle group contraction, and 5 minutes recovery in the initial position. Microcirculation was evaluated by photoplethysmography (PPG) and laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Pulse rate (PR) was obtained from PPG. Nonparametric statistics were used for phase comparisons. Dorsiflexion significantly modified the local perfusion, with PPG registering a decrease (p=0.028) while LDF registered an increase (p=0.028). PR did not change during the procedure. Foot dorsiflexion seems to cause different responses in the skin microvascular networks which might be attributed to the different measuring depths of the techniques employed, justifying further studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Florindo et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=6). Isometric dorsiflexion vs. Standing position was evaluated on Local perfusion measured by photoplethysmography (PPG) in arbitrary units (p=0.028). Isometric dorsiflexion significantly modified local perfusion compared to standing, with photoplethysmography registering a decrease (p=0.028) and laser Doppler flowmetry registering an increase (p=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: