Key result
Coil occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus does not expose pediatric patients to increased radiation entrance dose compared to standard diagnostic catheterization and pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty.
Why the study?
Does coil occlusion of a PDA increase radiation exposure compared to standard diagnostic catheterization or pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty in pediatric patients?
Observational (n=25)
Does coil occlusion of a PDA increase radiation exposure compared to standard diagnostic catheterization or pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty in pediatric patients?
p-value: p=NS
Coil occlusion of a PDA in pediatric patients does not result in increased radiation exposure compared to standard diagnostic catheterization or pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty.
Reassures on radiation safety of pediatric PDA coil occlusion; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
The risks of excessive exposure to ionizing radiation are well described and measures are routinely taken to limit such exposure to both patient and personnel in the catheterization laboratory. Coll occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) as well as other more complex pediatric interventions has raised concern regarding radiation exposure, particularly as minimally invasive surgical techniques are being developed which lack such exposure risk. In eight consecutive patients, aged 0.7-7 years (median, 2.3 years), coil occlusion of a PDA was performed and surface entrance radiation dose determined by thermoluminescent dosimetry (TD). Total cumulative doses (PA + lateral dose) were also calculated for each patient. Entrance and cumulative dose was likewise measured in 12 patients undergoing standard diagnostic catheterization (DC) and in 5 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty (PBV). The groups were comparable in age, weight, and body surface area (BSA). Total cumulative dose in the PDA patients was 97 +/- 25 mGy (mean +/- SE). There was no significant difference between the three groups in entrance dose absorbed at each location or in total cumulative dose. The mean total fluoroscopy time in the PDA occlusion group was significantly less than that of the PBV group (10.1 +/- 1.81 min vs. 19.3 +/- 2.29 min, P < 0.05) but was comparable to the DC group (13.2 +/- 1.5 min, P = NS). When the subjects were analyzed collectively, no correlation between fluoroscopy time and measured entrance dose was observed. The strongest correlates of total cumulative dose were patient weight (r = 0.67, P < 0.001) and BSA (r = 0.62, P = 0.001). Patients undergoing coil occlusion of a PDA are not exposed to increased radiation entrance dose compared to those undergoing standard DC and PBV. Furthermore, surface entrance radiation dose as determined by TD varies according to patient size for a given fluoroscopy time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Patent ductus arteriosus (n=25). Coil occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus vs. Standard diagnostic catheterization and pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty was evaluated on Surface entrance radiation dose and total cumulative dose (p=NS). Coil occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus does not expose pediatric patients to increased radiation entrance dose compared to standard diagnostic catheterization and pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: