Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) plays an important role in the regulation of bone formation and mineralization. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess the association of three IGF-1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs35767, rs2288377, and rs5742612 with osteoporosis risk. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was conducted. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: Four Chinese case-control studies with a total of 2807 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed an association between rs35767 and osteoporosis risk in all study subjects (women and men) in dominant (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.53, P < .001), recessive (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.35-2.21, P < .001), homozygote (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.46-2.45, P < .001), and allelic (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.18-1.47, P < .001) models. Subgroup analysis according to gender showed that rs35767 was associated with osteoporosis risk in women under dominant (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.54, P = .005), recessive (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19-2.12, P = .002), homozygote (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.28-2.34, P < .001), and allelic (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12-1.47, P < .001) models. Meta-analysis did not find associations of rs2288377 and rs5742612 with osteoporosis risk. There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity and publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that rs35767 is associated with osteoporosis risk in Chinese, whereas there is no association of rs2288377 and rs5742612 with osteoporosis risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: