Key result
Admission to an emergency department short-stay unit for acute heart failure significantly reduced mean length of stay to 4.75 days compared to 11.57 days in conventional hospital units.
Why the study?
Does admission to an emergency department short-stay unit reduce length of stay and mortality compared to conventional hospital units in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=2,434)
No
Does admission to an emergency department short-stay unit reduce length of stay and mortality compared to conventional hospital units in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure?
An emergency department short-stay unit is an effective and safe alternative to conventional hospitalization for selected patients with acute heart failure, significantly reducing length of stay without increasing 30-day readmissions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-stay units may shorten acute HF hospitalization without raising readmissions; leaves open mortality effects and needs randomized confirmation before practice change.
Study Objective: To determine whether a new emergency department short-stay unit (EDSSU) was an effective alternative to conventional hospital units (HU) for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure patients. Methods: Design: A comparative analysis was used to identify differences among patients admitted to EDSSU (n = 1546) and those admitted to the internal medicine (n = 552) or cardiology wards (n = 336) during the period of the study (January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012). Setting: The study was performed at Sant Pau Hospital, a 500-bed teaching tertiary care referral center in Barcelona, Spain. The ED attends about 144,000 emergency visits per year. Participants: We studied retrospectively the characteristics of patients hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012 (n = 2434). We chose charts of patients from the hospital discharge database and selected according to the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases Codes. We used the computerized database to obtain outcome data on all patients. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in terms of mean age (HU: 77.38 (14.44) years versus EDSSU: 82.43 (8.72) years; p p p p = 0.998). There were statistically significant differences regarding sex (HU women = 60.6%; EDDSU women = 67.7%; p p < 0.001). Conclusion: The EDSSU proved to be an effective and safe measure in emergency care of patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salazar et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure (n=2,434). Emergency department short-stay unit (EDSSU) vs. Conventional hospital units (internal medicine or cardiology wards) was evaluated on Mean length of stay (days) (p=<0.001). Admission to an emergency department short-stay unit for acute heart failure significantly reduced mean length of stay to 4.75 days compared to 11.57 days in conventional hospital units.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: