Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ2002 Apr 6; 324 : 819 –23 [OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] QUESTION: Do nurse practitioners (NPs) provide equivalent primary care at first point of contact to patients with undifferentiated health problems when compared with physicians? Published and unpublished studies were identified by searching Medline (1966–2001), EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (1980–2001), CINAHL (1982–2001), Science Citation Index, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, National Research Register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialist register; contacting authors of included studies, NP organisations, and educational training centres; and handsearching recent relevant journals, bibliographies, and reference lists. Studies in any language were selected if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective observational studies from developed countries that compared NPs and physicians working in the same way as concurrent controls; nurses provided care at first point of contact, made an initial assessment, and managed patients … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBMJ%26rft.stitle%253DBMJ%26rft.aulast%253DHorrocks%26rft.auinit1%253DS.%26rft.volume%253D324%26rft.issue%253D7341%26rft.spage%253D819%26rft.epage%253D823%26rft.atitle%253DSystematic%2Breview%2Bof%2Bwhether%2Bnurse%2Bpractitioners%2Bworking%2Bin%2Bprimary%2Bcare%2Bcan%2Bprovide%2Bequivalent%2Bcare%2Bto%2Bdoctors%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1136%252Fbmj.324.7341.819%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11934775%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bmj&resid=324/7341/819&atom=%2Febnurs%2F5%2F4%2F121.atom
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and RCN Publishing Company Ltd (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: