In the lower range of cardiac output (CO, up to 15 l min-1), we found an excellent agreement between CO measured by bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques. CO estimated by bioimpedance was generally lower. The bioimpedance method had better reproducibility. Both methods seem valuable for non-invasive studies in healthy subjects at work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: