In prediction of reservoir properties using seismic data, use is frequently made of AVO techniques. However, such techniques may not always be successful. Hence a new technique has been devised — based on recording a subsurface AVO response in the well. Recording is achieved from five triaxial geophone shuttles at 15 m intervals — ideally one wavelength (of the predicted dominant source frequency) above the target. The source (two 150 cubic-inch Sleeve Guns) was deployed from the marine vessel’s boom and moving in a line such that shot spacing is as close as possible to the surface seismic offsets. The line might extend 3 km to each side the well. Processing of the AVO walkaway data takes place in three steps: data orientation; separation of the down and up P-wavefields; and deconvolution (using the downgoing P-wavefield to deconvolve the upgoing P-wavefield) to remove propagation effects. The surface seismic data (in this case a 3-D data set) are processed (gathered) and put through a rigorous 12-stage signal processing sequence. The AVOWSP and the surface gathers are then carefully tied to the zero-offset VSP. After application of the Offset Dependent Gain Function the data are solved for P-wave reflection amplitude (at angle 0°) and the gradient. Those results can then be mapped and contoured — to identify anomalous areas, at known sites (wells) and elsewhere. Additional refinement is continuously being sought, and is welcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: