Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present experiments were designed with two aims in mind: (1) to study, with perceptual cues, the so-called “generation effect” in implicit memory as measured by a word-stem completion task, and (2) to study the influence of perceptual and conceptual processes in such tasks. In the study phase, subjects wrote down regular (read condition) or irregular (generate condition) words presented to them on a sheet of paper. In the latter condition, the subjects had to mentally transpose underlined letters (EXAMELP for EXAMPLE). Two tests were administered in succession: word-stem completion and recognition. A new procedure was used in the word-stem completion task, whereby the subjects had to produce four nouns that came to mind for each stem. In Experiment 1, the results showed an absence of a generation effect and of intentionality when the first word that came to mind in word-stem completion was considered for analysis, contrary to that observed in recognition. However, a generation effect in the word-stem completion task was observed when the other three words that came to mind were considered. In Experiment 2, we attempted to make the generation of words more difficult by having the subjects mentally transpose four underlined letters. This manipulation did not affect either word-stem completion or the recognition data. The results are interpreted within the framework of the transfer-appropriate processing view advocated by Roediger, Weldon and Challis (1989).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serge Nicolas (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: