Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A major problem in self testing with random inputs is verification of the test quality, i.e., the computation of the fault coverage. The brute-force approach of using full-fault simulation does not seem attractive because of the logic structure volume, and the CPU time encountered. A new approach is therefore necessary. This paper describes a new analytical method of computing the fault coverage that is fast compared with simulation. If the fault coverage falls below a certain threshold, it is possible to identify the ``random-pattern-resistant'' faults, modify the logic to make them easy to detect, and thus, increase the fault coverage of the random test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savir et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: