Transient amine–boryl radicals R3N → ḂH2(1) have been generated in solution by hydrogen-atom abstraction from a variety of amine–borane complexes R3N → BH3, and studied by e.s.r. spectroscopy. The e.s.r. spectrum of (1; R = Me), and not of [Me3N → BH3]–˙ as previously proposed, is also detected after γ-irradiation of polycrystalline Me3N → BH3 at 77 K. The hyperfine splitting constants for (1) indicate a pyramidal arrangement of ligands about the boron centre, in contrast to the effectively planar geometry at the radical centre in isoelectronic primary alkyl radicals. In solution, (1; R = Et) rapidly abstracts halogen from alkyl bromides and less readily from alkyl chlorides; at 246 K ButBr is only 1.2 times more reactive than PrnBr. The radical (1; R = Et) adds to MeCN to give an iminyl radical and displaces a methyl radical from MeNC; it fails to add to ethylene, but adds readily to the more electron-deficient double bond in trimethyl(vinyl) silane. Amine–boryls undergo β-scission much more readily than their isoelectronic alkyl radical counterparts; this difference is attributable to the greater exothermicity of the former cleavage. The aziridine– and azetidine–boryl radicals undergo rapid ring opening; C–N cleavage in the cis-isomer of the 2-methylaziridine–boryl radical gives mainly the secondary alkyl radical, while the trans-isomer gives mainly the less stable primary alkyl radical. Substituted but-3-enylamine–boryl radicals, analogues of the hex-5-enyl radical, undergo regioselective 1,5-exo-cyclisation to give analogues of cyclopentylmethyl. Relative rates of β-scission and cyclisation of amine-boryl radicals have been determined in competition with their abstraction of bromine from ethyl bromide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baban et al. (1985) studied this question.