Why the study?
Does conditioned medium of hMSCs inhibit cardiac myofibroblast differentiation in an in vitro cardiac fibrosis model?
Does conditioned medium of hMSCs inhibit cardiac myofibroblast differentiation in an in vitro cardiac fibrosis model?
Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit matrix stiffness-induced cardiac myofibroblast differentiation through HGF secretion, downregulating AT1R and upregulating Smad7, suggesting a potential mechanism for their anti-fibrotic effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for hMSC anti-fibrotic effects in vitro; leaves open in vivo efficacy and clinical translation.
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) hold great promise in cardiac fibrosis therapy, due to their potential ability of inhibiting cardiac myofibroblast differentiation (a hallmark of cardiac fibrosis). However, the mechanism involved in their effects remains elusive. To explore this, it is necessary to develop an in vitro cardiac fibrosis model that incorporates pore size and native tissue-mimicking matrix stiffness, which may regulate cardiac myofibroblast differentiation. In the present study, collagen coated polyacrylamide hydrogel substrates were fabricated, in which the pore size was adjusted without altering the matrix stiffness. Stiffness is shown to regulate cardiac myofibroblast differentiation independently of pore size. Substrate at a stiffness of 30 kPa, which mimics the stiffness of native fibrotic cardiac tissue, was found to induce cardiac myofibroblast differentiation to create in vitro cardiac fibrosis model. Conditioned medium of hMSCs was applied to the model to determine its role and inhibitory mechanism on cardiac myofibroblast differentiation. It was found that hMSCs secrete hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) to inhibit cardiac myofibroblast differentiation via downregulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT 1 R) and upregulation of Smad7. These findings would aid in establishment of the therapeutic use of hMSCs in cardiac fibrosis therapy in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yong et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: