Why the study?
Are infants ≤6 months of age with Kawasaki disease at higher risk for coronary arterial abnormalities compared to older patients?
Are infants ≤6 months of age with Kawasaki disease at higher risk for coronary arterial abnormalities compared to older patients?
Infants 6 months of age and younger with Kawasaki disease have a significantly higher incidence of coronary arterial abnormalities and aneurysms compared to older patients.
KD infants ≤6 months show higher coronary risks; supports intensified monitoring but leaves open prospective validation of age-specific protocols.
Purpose : The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiologic status of Kawasaki disease (KD) in infants ≤6 months of age. : For the epidemiologic study of KD in Korea, data from 2 2 ,6 7 4 KD patients were collected from 1 9 9 7 to 2 0 0 5 on a 3 -year basis by a retrospective survey. From this survey, data of 1 ,7 3 9 KD patients ≤6 months of age were analyzed and compared with those of KD patients > 6 months of age. Results : A total of 1 ,7 3 9 patients ≤6 months of age, including 1 ,0 8 8 males and 6 5 1 females, represented 7 .7% of total KD patients. These subjects included 2 2 patients aged < 1 month, 1 7 1 patients aged 1 -2 months, 3 0 4 patients aged 2 -3, 4 0 7 patients aged 3 -4 months, 3 7 2 patients aged 4 -5 months, and 4 6 3 patients aged 5 -6 months. Their mean age of onset was 4 .3 months, and the male-to-female ratio was 1 .6 7 :1 . Incidences of coronary arterial (CA) abnormalities (2 1 .0% versus 1 8 .7 %) and CA aneurysms (4 .7 % versus 3 .1 %) detected by echocardiography showed differences between patients with KD younger and older than 6 months, respectively. Conclusion : Comparison of data from KD patients > 6 months old with data from 1 ,7 3 9 KD patients ≤6 months old showed significantly higher incidences of CA abnormalities and CA aneurysms in the younger patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: